maroon_and_rathdowney

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
maroon_and_rathdowney [2024/06/21 21:39] – [Land selections on and near Maroon] judithmaroon_and_rathdowney [2024/06/21 21:40] (current) judith
Line 67: Line 67:
 While TLM-P joined his fellow squatters in circumventing the selection acts, he was sympathetic to the desire for people to own their own land. He was also aware that small holdings rarely provided a living for the selector. For more on this topic see THM-P's 1888 diary under [[tlm-p_s_diaries|TLM-P's Diaries]]. Collyer, in her thesis, argued that 'in the Boonah area there was little or no antagonism between squatters and selectors'. Her abstract states that:   While TLM-P joined his fellow squatters in circumventing the selection acts, he was sympathetic to the desire for people to own their own land. He was also aware that small holdings rarely provided a living for the selector. For more on this topic see THM-P's 1888 diary under [[tlm-p_s_diaries|TLM-P's Diaries]]. Collyer, in her thesis, argued that 'in the Boonah area there was little or no antagonism between squatters and selectors'. Her abstract states that:  
  
-//Reasons for this included the fact that squatters around Boonah had not been aggressive in freeholding their runs as squatters elsewhere were reputed to have done. Thus there was more land available for Boonah selectors. Many of the latter were keen to take up the fertile scrubs, which had been useless to squatters since they contain no grass for grazing. Thus squatters and selectors did not always compete for the same land. The selectors were not dependent on squatters for seasonal work, nor were squatters dependent on selectors for labour, since Boonah squatters generally ran cattle not sheep by the 1870s. Besides, the pace of selection after the 1868 Alienation Act precluded squatters from monopolizing their runs before selectors arrived to take up their blocks. For all these reasons, closer settlement came to the Boonah area without provoking antagonism between squatters and selectors.//((Angela Collyer, 1992, The process of settlement: land occupation and usage in Boonah 1842-1870s. M.A. Thesis, School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, The University of Queensland.[[https://doi.org/10.14264/189281]]. Thanks to Russell Scholl for pointing this out.))\\+//Reasons for this included the fact that squatters around Boonah had not been aggressive in freeholding their runs as squatters elsewhere were reputed to have done. Thus there was more land available for Boonah selectors. Many of the latter were keen to take up the fertile scrubs, which had been useless to squatters since they contain no grass for grazing. Thus squatters and selectors did not always compete for the same land. The selectors were not dependent on squatters for seasonal work, nor were squatters dependent on selectors for labour, since Boonah squatters generally ran cattle not sheep by the 1870s. Besides, the pace of selection after the 1868 Alienation Act precluded squatters from monopolizing their runs before selectors arrived to take up their blocks. For all these reasons, closer settlement came to the Boonah area without provoking antagonism between squatters and selectors.//((Angela Collyer, 1992, The process of settlement: land occupation and usage in Boonah 1842-1870s. M.A. Thesis, School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, The University of Queensland.[[https://doi.org/10.14264/189281]]. Thanks to Russell Scholl for drawing my attention to this reference.))\\
 \\ \\
 ==== Rathdowney ==== ==== Rathdowney ====
  • maroon_and_rathdowney.1718969977.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2024/06/21 21:39
  • by judith